The very popular R package ‘ggrepel’ does a great job at avoiding overlaps among data labels and between them and observations plotted as points. A difficulty that stems from the use of an algorithm based on random displacements is that the final location of the data labels can become more disordered than necessary. In addition when including smooth regression lines the data labels may partly occlude the fitted line and/or the confidence band.

Package ‘ggpp’ defines new position functions that save the starting
position like `position_nudge_repel()`

does but come in
multiple flavors. Their use together with repulsive geometries from
‘ggrepel’ makes it possible to give to the data labels an initial “push”
in a non-random direction. This helps a lot, much more than what I
expect initially, in obtaining a more orderly displacement by repulsion
of the data labels away from a cloud of observations or a line.

Another problem sometimes encountered when using position functions is that combinations of pairs of displacements would be required. ‘ggpp’ does define such new position functions which can also be used together with the repulsive geometries from package ‘ggrepel’.

Because of the naming convention used, the new position functions
remain fully compatible with all geometries that have a formal parameter
`position`

. However, most examples below use geometries from
packages ‘ggrepel’ or ‘ggpp’ to create a plot layer containing data
labels.

As we will use text and labels on the plotting area we change the default theme to an uncluttered one.

```
library(dplyr)
library(lubridate)
library(ggplot2)
library(ggpp)
library(grid)
# Is a compatible version of 'ggrepel' installed?
<- requireNamespace("ggrepel", quietly = TRUE) &&
eval_ggrepel packageVersion("ggrepel") >= "0.9.2"
if (eval_ggrepel) library(ggrepel)
<- theme_set(theme_bw()) old_theme
```

Nudging shifts deterministically the *x* and/or *y*
coordinates of an observation. This takes place early enough for the
limits of the corresponding scales be set based on the displaced
positions. In ‘ggplot2’, position functions and consequently also
geometries by default apply no nudging.

Function `position_nudge()`

from package ‘ggplot2’ applies
the nudge, to *x* and/or *y* data coordinates based
directly on the values passed to its parameters `x`

and
`y`

. Passing arguments to the `nudge_x`

and/or
`nudge_y`

parameters of a geometry has the same effect, as
these values are passed to `position_nudge()`

within the
geometry’s code. Geometries also have a `position`

parameter
to which we can pass an expression based on a *position function*
which opens the door to more elaborate approaches to nudging, as well as
allowing other changes in coordinates such as stacking.

We use `geom_point_s()`

to exemplify what nudging does.
The black dots are the original positions and the red ones the nudged
positions, with the arrows of length 0.5 along *x*, showing the
displacement and its direction.

```
ggplot(data.frame(x = 1:10, y = rnorm(10)), aes(x, y)) +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(nudge_x = 0.5, colour = "red")
```

Function `position_nudge_keep()`

keeps a copy of the
original position making it possible for geometries like
`geom_point_s()`

to draw connecting segments or arrows.

Package ‘ggpp’ provides several new position functions to facilitate
nudging. All of them keep the original positions to allow links to be
drawn. Some of them, just simplify some use cases, e.g.,
`position_nudge_to()`

, which accepts the desired nudged
coordinates directly, instead of as a displacement away from the initial
position. This allows to push data labels away from observations into a
row or column.

Other new position functions compute the nudge for individual
observations based on different criteria. For example by nudging away
from a focal point, a line or a curve. The focal point or line can be
either supplied directly or fitted to the observations. In
`position_nudge_center()`

and
`position_nudge_line()`

described below, this reference
alters only the direction (angle) along which nudge is applied but not
the extent of the shift. Advanced nudging works very well, but only for
some patterns of observations and may require manual adjustment of
positions, repulsion is more generally applicable but like jittering is
aleatory. Combining nudging and repulsion we can make repulsion more
predictable with little loss of its applicability.

These position functions can be used with any geometry but if
segments joining the nudged positions to the original ones are desired,
only geometries from packages ‘ggrepel’ or ‘ggpp’ can currently be used.
Geometries `geom_text_repel()`

or
`geom_label_repel()`

from ‘ggrepel’ should be used when
repulsion is desired. Setting `max.iter = 0`

in these
functions disables repulsion but allows the drawing of segments or
arrows. Alternatively, several geometries from ‘ggpp’ implement the
drawing of connecting segments, but none of them implement repulsion.
Please see the documentation for the different geometries from packages
‘ggrepel’ and ‘ggpp’ for the details.

As mentioned above, drawing of segments or arrows is made possible by
position functions storing in `data`

both the nudged and
original *x* and *y* coordinates. The joint use of
‘ggrepel’ and ‘ggpp’ was made possible by coordinated development of
these packages and agreement on a naming convention for storing the
original position. Keeping both nudged and original positions increases
the size of the data, and consequently also the size of the ggplot
objects. Because of this, the position functions from ‘ggpp’ allow the
keeping of the original positions to be disabled when needed.

Function `position_nudge_keep()`

is like
`ggplot2::position_nudge()`

but keeps (stores) the original
*x* and *y* coordinates. It is similar to function
`position_nudge_repel()`

but uses a different naming
convention for the coordinates. Both work with
`geom_text_repel()`

or `geom_label_repel()`

from
package ‘ggrepel’ (>= 0.9.2), but only
`position_nudge_keep()`

can be used interchangeably with
`ggplot2::position_nudge()`

with other geometries such as
`geom_text()`

.

```
set.seed(84532)
<- data.frame(
df x = rnorm(20),
y = rnorm(20, 2, 2),
l = paste("label:", letters[1:20])
)
```

With `position_nudge_keep()`

from ‘ggpp’ used together
with `geom_text_repel()`

or `geom_label_repel()`

segments between a nudged and/or repelled label and the original
position (here indicated by a point) are drawn. As shown here, passing
`max.iter = 0`

disables repulsion.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position = position_nudge_keep(x = 0.3),
max.iter = 0)
```

With `position_nudge()`

from ‘ggplot2’ used together with
`geom_text_repel()`

or `geom_label_repel()`

segments connecting a nudged and/or repelled label and the original
position (here indicated by a point) are **not** drawn.

`position_nudge_keep()`

and all other position functions
from ‘ggpp’, described below, can be used with all ‘ggplot2’ geometries
but the original position will be ignored and no connecting segment
drawn unless the geometry has been designed to work together with them.
Currently, `geom_text_repel()`

and
`geom_label_repel()`

from ‘ggrepel’ and
`geom_text_s()`

, `geom_label_s()`

,
`geom_point_s()`

, `geom_plot()`

,
`geom_table()`

and `geom_grob()`

from package
‘ggpp’ draw connecting segments.

The geometries from ‘ggrepel’ and ‘ggpp’ can interoperate. However,
these geometries are different in several respects. The simpler
geometries from ‘ggpp’ add a few features but lack several features
compared to `geom_text_repel()`

and
`geom_label_repel()`

. First of all, the geometries from
‘ggpp’ do not support repulsion. Those from ‘ggpp’ allow aesthetic
mappings to be selectively applied to the different components of the
label and/or to segments. However, they do not support aesthetics
affecting the segments. While `geom_text_repel()`

and
`geom_label_repel()`

support curved connecting segments and
arrows, the geometries from ‘ggpp’ support only straight segments and
arrows.

Another important difference is that the geometries from the two
packages use by default a different approach to justification of the
displaced data labels. The geometries from ‘ggpp’ by default justify the
text or label to the nearest edge to the original position (thus, away
from it). This new justification approach named `"position"`

in ‘ggpp’ is not yet available in geometries defined in ‘ggrepel’.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_s(position = position_nudge_keep(x = 0.1),
min.segment.length = 0) +
expand_limits(x = 2.3)
```

`geom_text_repel()`

draws the segment by default from the
centre of the text and trims it to the edge of the text plus the
padding. In contrast, `geom_text_s()`

uses justification to
avoid the overlap and only the default justification
`"position"`

and one of the edges, “left” in this case, are
currently usable as the untrimmed segment otherwise overplots the text
(not shown).

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_s(position = position_nudge_keep(x = 0.1),
min.segment.length = 0,
hjust = "left") +
expand_limits(x = 2.3)
```

Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. The main difference
is that with `geom_text_s()`

and `geom_label_s()`

shorter nudging displacements may be needed than with
`geom_text_repel()`

and `geom_label_repel()`

when
using their respective default justification approaches.

A usually more problematic example is the labeling of loadings in PCA and similar biplots.

```
## Example data frame where each species' principal components have been computed.
<- data.frame(
df1 Species = paste("Species",1:5),
PC1 = c(-4, -3.5, 1, 2, 3),
PC2 = c(-1, -1, 0, -0.5, 0.7))
ggplot(df1, aes(x=PC1, y = PC2, label = Species, colour = Species)) +
geom_hline(aes(yintercept = 0), linewidth = .2) +
geom_vline(aes(xintercept = 0), linewidth = .2) +
geom_segment(aes(x = 0, y = 0, xend = PC1, yend = PC2),
arrow = arrow(length = unit(0.1, "inches"))) +
geom_label_repel(position = position_nudge_center(x = 0.2, y = 0.01,
center_x = 0, center_y = 0),
label.size = NA,
label.padding = 0.1,
fill = rgb(red = 1, green = 1, blue = 1, alpha = 0.75)) +
xlim(-5, 5) +
ylim(-2, 2) +
# Stadard settings for displaying biplots
coord_fixed() +
theme(legend.position = "none")
```

The use of `position_nudge_center()`

together with
repulsion, shown above, results a much better plot than using only
repulsion.

```
ggplot(df1, aes(x=PC1, y = PC2, label = Species, colour = Species)) +
geom_hline(aes(yintercept = 0), linewidth = .2) +
geom_vline(aes(xintercept = 0), linewidth = .2) +
geom_segment(aes(x = 0, y = 0, xend = PC1, yend = PC2),
arrow = arrow(length = unit(0.1, "inches"))) +
geom_label_repel(label.size = NA,
label.padding = 0.1,
fill = rgb(red = 1, green = 1, blue = 1, alpha = 0.75)) +
xlim(-5, 5) +
ylim(-2, 2) +
# Stadard settings for displaying biplots
coord_fixed() +
theme(legend.position = "none")
```

The use of `position_nudge_center()`

together with
repulsion, shown above, results a much better plot than using only
nudging. In this case, the default justification to the center needs to
be overidden.

```
ggplot(df1, aes(x=PC1, y = PC2, label = Species, colour = Species)) +
geom_hline(aes(yintercept = 0), linewidth = .2) +
geom_vline(aes(xintercept = 0), linewidth = .2) +
geom_segment(aes(x = 0, y = 0, xend = PC1, yend = PC2),
arrow = arrow(length = unit(0.1, "inches"))) +
geom_label(position = position_nudge_center(x = 0.2, y = 0.01,
center_x = 0, center_y = 0),
label.size = 0,
vjust = "outward", hjust = "outward",
fill = rgb(red = 1, green = 1, blue = 1, alpha = 0.75)) +
xlim(-5, 5) +
ylim(-2, 2) +
# Stadard settings for displaying biplots
coord_fixed() +
theme(legend.position = "none")
```

Of course, nudging and justification could be manually adjusted for each label, but here we are concerned with approaches that avoid manual tweaking.

Function `position_nudge_to()`

nudges to a given position
instead of using the same shift for each observation. It can be used to
align labels for points that are not themselves aligned.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = ifelse(x < 0.5, "", l) )) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position =
position_nudge_to(x = 2.3),
min.segment.length = 0,
segment.color = "red",
arrow = arrow(length = unit(0.015, "npc")),
direction = "y") +
expand_limits(x = 3)
```

By providing two values for nudging with opposite sign, we can add
labels alternating between sides. We use here `geom_text_s()`

but other geometries could have been used as well. How the data labels
been closer together repulsion would have been needed in addition to
nudging.

```
<- function(x) {sqrt(max(0, x) / pi)}
size_from_area
<- data.frame(b = exp(seq(2, 4, length.out = 10)))
df2
ggplot(df2, aes(1, b, size = b)) +
geom_text_s(aes(label = round(b,2)),
position = position_nudge_to(x = c(1.1, 0.9)),
box.padding = 0.5) +
geom_point() +
scale_size_area() +
xlim(0, 2) +
theme(legend.position = "none")
```

It is also useful when labeling curves than end at different
positions along the *x* axis. In this example we avoid overlaps
with repulsion along the *y* axis. The data set used in this
example is dynamic, so we use nudging to a position that is dynamicaly
computed from the data.

```
<- c("Israel", "United States", "European Union", "China", "South Africa", "Qatar",
keep "Argentina", "Chile", "Brazil", "Ukraine", "Indonesia", "Bangladesh")
<- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/owid/covid-19-data/master/public/data/vaccinations/vaccinations.csv")
data $date <- ymd(data$date)
data
%>%
data filter(location %in% keep) %>%
select(location, date, total_vaccinations_per_hundred) %>%
arrange(location, date) %>%
filter(!is.na(total_vaccinations_per_hundred)) %>%
mutate(location = factor(location),
location = reorder(location, total_vaccinations_per_hundred)) %>%
group_by(location) %>% # max(date) depends on the location!
mutate(label = if_else(date == max(date),
as.character(location),
"")) -> owid
ggplot(owid,
aes(x = date,
y = total_vaccinations_per_hundred,
color = location)) +
geom_line() +
geom_text_repel(aes(label = label),
size = 3,
position = position_nudge_to(x = max(owid$date) + days(30)),
segment.color = 'grey',
point.size = 0,
box.padding = 0.1,
point.padding = 0.1,
hjust = "left",
direction = "y") +
scale_x_date(expand = expansion(mult = c(0.05, 0.2))) +
labs(title = "Cumulative COVID-19 vaccination doses administered per 100 people",
y = "",
x = "Date (year-month)") +
theme_bw() +
theme(legend.position = "none")
```

In the call to `position_nudge_to()`

we passed a vector of
length one as argument for `y`

, but both `x`

and
`y`

also accept longer vectors. In other words, this position
function makes it possible manual positioning of text and labels.

In the next example we decrease the forces used for repulsion and the padding so that the labels remain close together. In this way, we can label the observations on the rug of a combined point and rug plot.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = round(x, 2))) +
geom_point(size = 3) +
geom_text_repel(position = position_nudge_to(y = -2.7),
size = 3,
angle = 90,
hjust = 0,
box.padding = 0.05,
min.segment.length = Inf,
direction = "x",
force = 0.1,
force_pull = 0.1) +
geom_rug(sides = "b", length = unit(0.02, "npc"))
```

In many cases data are distributed as a cloud with decreasing density towards edges. In some other cases, even with evely distributed observations, a certain partly systematic pattern of displacement of data labels is visually more attractive than a fully random one. In both cases, combining nudging and repulsion is usually an effective approach.

We start with an examples showing a specific nudging pattern, and
only later we combine them with repulsion. Function
`position_nudge_center()`

can nudge radially away from a
focal point if both `x`

and `y`

are passed as
arguments, or towards opposite sides of a vertical or horizontal
*virtual* boundary line if only one of `x`

or
`y`

is passed an argument. By default, the “center” is the
centroid computed using `mean()`

, but other functions or
numeric values can be passed to override it. When data are sparse, such
nudging may be effective in avoiding label overlaps, and in achieving a
visually pleasing positioning.

By default, split is away or towards the `mean()`

. Here we
allow repulsion to separate the labels (compare with the previous
plot).

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed") +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.3, center_x = 0),
colour = "red")
```

In this second example we use repulsion and add data labels instead
of displaced points. In all cases nudging shifts the coordinates giving
a new *x* and/or *y* position that expands the limits of
the corresponding scales to include the nudged coordinate values, but
not necessarily the whole of justified text or labels.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed") +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.3, center_x = 0),
min.segment.length = 0)
```

We set a different split point as a constant value.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 1, linetype = "dashed") +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.3, center_x = 1),
colour = "red")
```

We set a different split point as the value computed by a function function, by name.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = median(df$x), linetype = "dashed") +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.3, center_x = median),
colour = "red")
```

We set a different split point as the value computed by an anonymous
function. Here we split on the first quartile along *x* and
*y* = 2.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.3, y = 0.3,
center_x = function(x) {
quantile(x,
probs = 1/4,
names = FALSE)
},center_y = 2,
direction = "split"),
colour = "red")
```

The labels can be rotated as long as the geometry used supports this.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(angle = 90,
position =
position_nudge_center(y = 0.1,
direction = "split"))
```

By requesting nudging along *x* and *y* and setting
`direction = "split"`

nudging is applied according to the
quadrants centred on the centroid of the data.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
stat_centroid(shape = "+", size = 5, colour = "red") +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.2,
y = 0.3,
direction = "split"),
colour = "red")
```

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.1,
y = 0.15,
direction = "split"))
```

With `direction = "radial"`

, the distance nudged away from
the center is the same for all labels.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
stat_centroid(shape = "+", size = 5, colour = "red") +
geom_point() +
geom_point_s(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.25,
y = 0.4,
direction = "radial"),
colour = "red")
```

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.25,
y = 0.4,
direction = "radial"),
min.segment.length = 0)
```

As shown above for `direction = "split"`

we can set the
coordinates of the center also with
`direction = "radial"`

.

We can also set the justification of the text labels although
repulsion usually works best with labels justified at the centre, which
is the default in `geom_text_repel()`

.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.125,
y = 0.25,
center_x = 0,
center_y = 0,
direction = "radial"),
min.segment.length = 0,
hjust = "outward", vjust = "outward") +
expand_limits(x = c(-2.7, +2.3))
```

Nudging along one axis, here *x*, and setting the repulsion
`direction`

along the other axis, here *y*, tends to
give a pleasant arrangement of labels.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.2,
center_x = 0,
direction = "split"),
aes(hjust = "outward"),
direction = "y",
min.segment.length = 0) +
expand_limits(x = c(-3, 3))
```

When some regions have a high density of observations we may wish to
only label those in the lower density regions. To automate this, we can
use statistics `stat_dens2d_labels()`

or
`stat_dens1d_labels()`

that replace the labels with
`""`

but retain all rows in data so that repulsion away from
all points is achieved. In contrast, `stat_dens2d_filter()`

or `stat_dens1d_filter()`

subset `data`

using
identical criteria.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
stat_dens2d_labels(geom = "text_repel",
keep.fraction = 1/3,
position =
position_nudge_center(x = 0.2,
center_x = 0,
direction = "split"),
aes(hjust = ifelse(x < 0, 1, 0)),
direction = "y",
min.segment.length = 0) +
stat_dens2d_filter(geom = "point",
keep.fraction = 1/3,
shape = "circle open", size = 3) +
expand_limits(x = c(-3, 3))
```

We create a set of example data with a denser distribution.

```
<- function(len = 3) {
random_string paste(sample(letters, len, replace = TRUE), collapse = "")
}
# Make random data.
set.seed(1001)
<- tibble::tibble(
d x = rnorm(100),
y = rnorm(100),
group = rep(c("A", "B"), c(50, 50)),
lab = replicate(100, { random_string() })
)
```

```
ggplot(data = d, aes(x, y, label = lab, colour = group)) +
geom_point() +
stat_dens2d_labels(geom = "text_repel",
keep.fraction = 0.45)
```

With `geom_label_repel`

one usually needs to use a smaller
value for `keep.fracton`

, or a smaller `size`

, as
labels use more space on the plot than the test alone.

Additional arguments can be used to change the angle and position of
the text, but may give unexpected output when labels are long as the
repulsion algorithm “sees” always a rectangular bounding box that is not
rotated. With short labels or angles that are multiples of 90 degrees,
there is no such problem. Please, see the documentation for
`ggrepel::geom_text_repel`

and
`ggrepel::geom_label_repel`

for the various ways in which
both repulsion and formatting of the labels can be adjusted.

Using `NA`

as argument to `label.fill`

makes
the observations with labels set to `NA`

*incomplete*,
and such rows in data are skipped when rendering the plot, before the
repulsion algorithm is active. This can lead to overlap between text and
points corresponding to unlabelled observations. Whether points are
occluded depends on the order of layers and transparency, the occlusion
can remain easily unnoticed with `geom_label`

and
`geom_label_repel`

. We keep `geom_point`

as the
topmost layer to ensure that all observations are visible.

```
ggplot(data = d, aes(x, y, label = lab, colour = group)) +
stat_dens2d_labels(geom = "label_repel",
keep.fraction = 0.2,
label.fill = NA) +
geom_point()
```

The 1D versions work similarly but assess the density along only one
of *x* or *y*. In other respects than
`orientation`

and the parameters passed internally to
`stats::density()`

the examples given earlier for
`stat_dens2d_labels()`

also apply
`stat_dens1d_labels()`

.

An example for a plot based on an enhancement suggested in an issue
raised at GitHub by Michael Schubert, made possible by parameter
`keep.these`

added for this and similar use cases.

```
library(ggplot2)
library(ggpp)
library(ggrepel)
= c(letters[1:5], LETTERS[1:5], 0:9)
syms = do.call(paste0, expand.grid(syms, syms))
labs = data.frame(x=rnorm(1e3), y=rnorm(1e3), label=sample(labs, 1e3, replace=TRUE)) dset
```

```
ggplot(dset, aes(x=x, y=y, label = label)) +
geom_point(colour = "grey85") +
stat_dens2d_filter(geom = "text_repel",
position = position_nudge_centre(x = 0.1,
y = 0.1,
direction = "radial"),
keep.number = 50,
keep.these = c("aA", "bB", "cC"),
min.segment.length = 0) +
theme_bw()
```

Function `position_nudge_line()`

nudges away from a line,
which can be a user supplied straight line as well as a smooth spline or
a polynomial fitted to the observations themselves. The nudging is away
and perpendicular to the local slope of the straight or curved line. It
relies on the same assumptions as linear regression, assuming that
*x* values are not subject to error. This in most cases prevents
labels from overlapping a curve fitted to the data, even if not exactly
based on the same model fit. When observations are sparse, this may be
enough to obtain a nice arrangement of data labels, otherwise, it can be
used in combination with repulsive geometries.

```
set.seed(16532)
<- data.frame(
df x = -10:10,
y = (-10:10)^2,
yy = (-10:10)^2 + rnorm(21, 0, 4),
yyy = (-10:10) + rnorm(21, 0, 4),
l = letters[1:21]
)
```

The first, simple example shows that
`position_nudge_line()`

has shifted the direction of the
nudging based on the alignment of the observations along a line. One
could, of course, have in this case passed suitable values as arguments
to *x* and *y* using `position_nudge()`

from
package ‘ggplot2’. However, `position_nudge_line()`

will work
without change with curves or with observations not exactly falling on a
line.

In the plots that follow the original positions are shown in black and the nudged ones in red, with an arrow showing the displacement introduced by nudging.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, 2 * x, label = l)) +
geom_point() +
geom_abline(intercept = 0, slope = 2, linetype = "dotted") +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(x = -1, y = -2),
colour = "red")
```

With observations with variation in *y*, a linear model fit
may need to be used. In this case fitted twice, once in
`stat_smooth()`

and once in
`position_nudge_line()`

.

```
ggplot(subset(df, x >= 0), aes(x, yyy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "lm", formula = y ~ x) +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(x = 0, y = 1.2,
method = "lm",
direction = "split"),
colour = "red")
```

With lower variation in *y*, we can pass to
`line_nudge`

a multiplier to keep labels outside of the
confidence band.

```
ggplot(subset(df, x >= 0), aes(y, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "lm", formula = y ~ x) +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(method = "lm",
x = 1.5, y = 3,
line_nudge = 2.75,
direction = "split"),
colour = "red")
```

If we want the nudging based on an arbitrary straight line not
computed from `data`

, we can pass the intercept and slope in
a numeric vector of length two as an argument to parameter
`abline`

.

```
ggplot(subset(df, x >= 0), aes(y, yy)) +
geom_point() +
geom_abline(intercept = 0, slope = 1, linetype = "dotted") +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(abline = c(0, 1),
x = 3, y = 6,
direction = "split"),
colour = "red")
```

More frequently observations follow curves rather than straight
lines. If observations follow exactly a simple curve nudging away from
the curve with `position_nudge_line()`

can be very effective.
In this case, the interpretation of values passed as arguments to
parameters `x`

and `y`

of the position function
differs from that in `position_nudge()`

: positive values
correspond to above and inside the curve and negative ones, the opposite
direction.

The next plot shows the effect of nudging with the original positions as black dots and the nudged positions as red dots.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_point() +
geom_line(linetype = "dotted") +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(x = 0.6, y = 6),
colour = "red")
```

Negative values passed as arguments to `x`

and
`y`

correspond to labels below and outside the curve.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_point() +
geom_line(linetype = "dotted") +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(x = -0.6, y = -6),
colour = "red")
```

When the observations include random variation along *y*, it
is important that the smoother used for the line added to a plot and
that passed to `position_nudge_line()`

are similar. By
default `stat_smooth()`

uses `"loess"`

and
`position_nudge_line()`

with method `"spline"`

,
`smooth.sline()`

, which are a good enough match.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "loess", formula = y ~ x) +
geom_point_s(position = position_nudge_line(x = 0.6, y = 6,
direction = "split"),
colour = "red")
```

We can use other geometries, or rather we need to use a repulsive geometry when the label text is long or the labels are crowded near the line. Combining repulsion and computed nudging is effective.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "loess", formula = y ~ x) +
geom_label_repel(aes(y = yy, label = paste("point", l)),
position = position_nudge_line(x = 0.6,
y = 8,
direction = "split"),
box.padding = 0.3,
min.segment.length = 0)
```

We can see by comparing the plot above with that below, that combining nudging away from a line with repulsion results in a more pleasant positioning of the data labels.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "loess", formula = y ~ x) +
geom_label_repel(aes(y = yy, label = paste("point", l)),
box.padding = 0.5,
min.segment.length = 0)
```

Nudging alone, as shown next, results in overlaps and clipping.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "loess", formula = y ~ x) +
geom_label_s(aes(y = yy, label = paste("point", l)),
position = position_nudge_line(x = 0.6,
y = 8,
direction = "split"),
box.padding = 0,
min.segment.length = 0)
```

While `box.padding`

in `geom_text_repel()`

controls the separation among data labels as well as between data labels
and points, in `geom_label_s()`

it controls only the distance
between the end of the segment and the data label.

When fitting a polynomial, `"lm"`

should be the argument
passed to `method`

and a model formula preferably based on
`poly()`

, setting `raw = TRUE`

, as argument to
`formula`

.

*Currently no other methods are implemented in*
`position_nudge_line()`

.

In the case of data labels that are small, a single character in the next example, we also benefit from nudging if they are near a fitted line. Nudging plus repulsion, shown next, will be compared to alternatives. In this case we assume no linking segments are desired as there is enough space for the data labels to remain near the observations.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "lm",
formula = y ~ poly(x, 2, raw = TRUE)) +
geom_text_repel(aes(y = yy, label = l),
position = position_nudge_line(method = "lm",
formula = y ~ poly(x, 2, raw = TRUE),
x = 0.5,
y = 5,
direction = "split"),
box.padding = 0.25,
min.segment.length = Inf)
```

Using nudging alone there is little difference, but there is always the posibility of overlaps, so using nudging plus repulsion as above is safer.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "lm",
formula = y ~ poly(x, 2, raw = TRUE)) +
geom_text(aes(y = yy, label = l),
position = position_nudge_line(method = "lm",
formula = y ~ poly(x, 2, raw = TRUE),
x = 0.5,
y = 5,
direction = "split"))
```

Repulsion without nudging as shown below is unsatisfactory in this case, i.e., adding nudging displaces the data labels in the desired direction. Compare the plot below using no nudging with the one above.

```
ggplot(df, aes(x, yy)) +
geom_point() +
stat_smooth(method = "lm",
formula = y ~ poly(x, 2, raw = TRUE)) +
geom_text_repel(aes(y = yy, label = l),
box.padding = 0.25,
min.segment.length = Inf)
```

Using `position_stacknudge()`

together
`geom_label_repel()`

makes it possible to use repulsion for
labeling sections of stacked column plots.

```
<- tibble::tribble(
df ~y, ~x, ~grp,
"a", 1, "some long name",
"a", 2, "other name",
"b", 1, "some name",
"b", 3, "another name",
"b", -1, "some long name"
)
ggplot(data = df, aes(x, y, group = grp)) +
geom_col(aes(fill = grp), width=0.5) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 0) +
geom_label_repel(aes(label = grp),
position = position_stacknudge(vjust = 0.5, y = 0.4),
label.size = NA)
```

I warmly thank Kamil Slowikowski for agreeing to make changes in ‘ggrepel’ that make the use of ‘ggrepel’ together with ‘ggpp’ possible and smooth. This document shows some use examples, but surely new ones will be found by users of R and ‘ggplot2’.